The design energy capacity of the mitigation structure is determined by comparing the design energy (action energy) with the resistance capacity (energy) of the structure. Various partial factors of safety are applied in order to compensate for uncertainties in the modeling results, as well as simplifications during product testing such as idealized impacts in the middle of a field and height of a fence panel, simplified block form, absence of rotational energy, etc.
The design value of action energy TE,d is based on the characteristic energy as determined by rockfall analysis results, which are carried out by the state-of-the-art techniques, and the product of a partial factor of safety according to the consequence class. The 99th fractile of the energy distribution for the design block generated from simulations is used for the characteristic value of energy (TE,k). The partial factor of safety (γE,kin).
TE,d : design value of action energy
TE,k : characteristic value of modeled energy that is equal to T99[design block]
γE,kin : partial factor of safety as per table.
The design resistance value of energy TR,d is based on the available commercial characteristic energy capacity of a structure (Tk,MEL) according to ETAG 27 guidelines reduced by a partial factor of safety according to the consequence class. The partial factor of safety (γT,R) is defined as per the table below.
TR,d : Design resistance of energy (capacity of fence)
Tk,MEL : Maximum Energy Level (MEL) energy class according to product approval (ETAG 27:2012, Clause 18.104.22.168)
γT,R : Partial factor of safety as per table.
For the verification of design absorption capacity, the design action value of energy must be smaller than or equal to the design resistance value of energy as follows:
EOTA (2012) ETAG 27: Guideline for European Technical Approval of Falling Rock Kits. Brussels, Belgium.
What level of risk is there?
How is the design block selected?
What system capacity is sufficient?
What system height is required?
How is an anchor verified?
What other performance criteria are there?
How can the system be safely adapted to a site?
What recommended maintenance protocols exist?